Class 10 vss
This Blog has been created on behalf if Valmiki students studying in grade ten. You people can go through the posts here, do the exercise and post your creationos well.
Saturday, June 6, 2020
Saroo's incredible journey to find his long lost family | 60 Minutes Aus...
Watch this video and write down your feelings in about 100 words.
The boy got lost at the railway station. 25 years later, his story shock...
Welcome to our Grade 10
Watch the video, listen to the story and write a paragraph assuming that you are Saru.
Friday, May 29, 2020
2012 A Perfect Disaster
Welcomehttps://drive.google.com/open… to our Grade 10
Khemlal Pahari shared a link.
Friday, May 1, 2020
A single Global Language vs Multi Language
Reading Exercise - 2
(Unit - 2)
Read the following
passage and do the exercises given below:
There has been a
debate competition in Gaurishankar Secondary School. Amrit Timilsina is the
Master of Ceremonies (MC). Karma and Kabita are the speakers in the final round
of the debate.
Read the transcriptions
of the debate below, and note some important points Karma and Kabita presented
to support their opinion.
For the motion: Using a
single language is better than multiple languages.
Mr. Chairperson, respected
teachers, and friends!
I would like to thank Mr.
Timilsina for giving me an opportunity to express my opinion on the burning issue “the fewer the languages there are, the
easier the life will be’. Every year, several languages die out. Some
people think that life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the
world. I support this view.
As we know, the
development of recent technology has a significant role to create a global
village. People from any part of the world can communicate easily through the
Internet. Due to the international importance of the English language, most
people are reluctant to use their first language and are learning English. This
shows that people prefer learning the language that helps them communicate in
the global village to their own language.
Mr. Chairperson, using the same language would certainly aid
understanding and global fraternity. People can communicate with one another
without any problems. It unites all the people as global citizens. If everyone
speaks the same language, there will be a clear understanding between not only
countries but also people throughout the world. It would promote learning, the
flow of information and ideas. For example, students don't have to translate
the text into their mother tongue to understand. Ladies and gentlemen, economic
growth is also possible by using single language as it can minimise various
costs such as the cost of communication, translation, interpretation, etc. We
won’t need interpreters in international conferences, seminars and workshops.
Participants can easily express whatever they like in the language of common
understanding. Thus, it can minimise the communication barriers and help
international business, resulting in a healthier world economy. Not only this, if a language is intelligible
for all, members of security forces can easily investigate and understand
national and international criminal plans. It may help in solving international
and intercultural security problems too. To conclude, I strongly claim that
using a single language as a lingua franca strengthens our fraternity,
integrity, security and global understanding, in addition to helping
international business and economy.
Thank you.
Against the motion: Using multiple languages is better than a
single language.
Mr. Chairperson, respected teachers, and
friends!
Thank you, Mr. Timilsina
for giving me this platform to present my view on the issue. As we know every
year several languages die out. With their death, the knowledge inherent there
dies too. Though the previous speaker argued that the fewer the languages
are, the easier the life will be, I strongly disagree with his
arguments.
Mr. Chairperson, language influences our
thought and our thought influences reality of the world around us. It means we
perceive the world as per our linguistic background. Language also carries
culture. Cultural and linguistic diversity have a reciprocal relationship.
Therefore, there are obvious disadvantages of having only one global language.
Firstly, it would mean that all other languages would eventually disappear and,
along with them, their cultures too. Each culture is unique with its own way of
life and own perspective of the world. Cultural diversity boosts tourism
because it attracts tourists from different parts of the world. The loss of
languages results in the loss of cultures and the loss of cultures leads to the
collapse of the tourism industry because there would be no reason to travel for
pleasure and interest if, all over the world, we have the same language and
similar cultures. This finally leads to decline of the national economy of the
countries which rely on tourism industry.
Mr. Chairperson, using fewer languages also
creates identity problems. The ethnic groups without their own language and
culture lose their linguistic and cultural identity. Variety in literature is
only possible through linguistic and cultural differences. It is impossible if
we have a single global language. Likewise, each language has its own taste and
own distinct quality. For example, the Sanskrit language is said to have
musical quality. All these qualities get lost if people start using a single
language all over the world. Furthermore, the fewer the languages are in use,
the less the vocabulary in practice. Therefore, the less vocabulary in
practice, the less imaginative and creative work is possible.
Ladies and gentlemen, I
would like to ask Karma if he could understand all the varieties, i.e. dialects
of his mother tongue. As we know, even the dialects are often unintelligible to
all the speakers of the same language. Then, how can we think about the use of
a single language all over the world? Is it practical? Is it possible? I think
debating on such issue is just a waste of time.
Thank you.
A. Find the following words in the text above, and
circle the best synonyms next to them.
(a) round : circle session gun
discharge
(b) motion : movement signal proposal for discussion
(c) issue : subject edition distribute
(d) view : opinion scene
watch
(e) reluctant :
unwilling enthusiastic eager
(f) fraternity : hostility friendship fragment
(g) promote : advertise encourage suppress
(h) intelligible : understandable meaningless clever
(i) integrity : completeness division dishonesty
6) present: now submit gift
(k) inherent: in-built acquired added later
(1) perceive : understand ignore hate
(m) diversity : uniformity variety regularity
(n) reciprocal : mutual one-sided better
(f) fraternity : hostility friendship fragment
(g) promote : advertise encourage suppress
(h) intelligible : understandable meaningless clever
(i) integrity : completeness division dishonesty
6) present: now submit gift
(k) inherent: in-built acquired added later
(1) perceive : understand ignore hate
(m) diversity : uniformity variety regularity
(n) reciprocal : mutual one-sided better
B. Match the following words with their meanings:
Column 'A' Column 'B'
(a) conference (i) particular evaluation of something
(b) lingua franca (ii) meeting for lectures and discussion
(©) perspective (iii) mixture of languages for communication
(d) decline (iv) regional variety of language
(e) dialect (v) get weaker
(vi) that can't be read
Column 'A' Column 'B'
(a) conference (i) particular evaluation of something
(b) lingua franca (ii) meeting for lectures and discussion
(©) perspective (iii) mixture of languages for communication
(d) decline (iv) regional variety of language
(e) dialect (v) get weaker
(vi) that can't be read
C. Rewrite the following sentences indicating T for
true statements and F for false ones:
(a) They are taking part in an essay competition.
(b) The motion of the debate is using the language.
(c) Karma is speaking for the motion.
(d) Karma says that economic growth is possible if we use single language.
(e) Kabita is speaking against the use of multiple languages.
(f) Kabita says that using single language may cause the identity problems.
(a) They are taking part in an essay competition.
(b) The motion of the debate is using the language.
(c) Karma is speaking for the motion.
(d) Karma says that economic growth is possible if we use single language.
(e) Kabita is speaking against the use of multiple languages.
(f) Kabita says that using single language may cause the identity problems.
D Answer the following questions.
(a) Who is conducting the debate program?
(b) What is the topic of the debate competition?
(c) According to Karma, when will the life be easier?
(d) Why are people not willing to use their first language?
(e) In what way does the use of single language promote the economic growth?
(f) How can the use of single language help in solving international and
problems?
(g) According to Kabita, how does the knowledge die?
(h) What thing influences our thought?
(I ) How does the loss of languages affect the tourism?
(j) What kind of relationship do the cultural and linguistic diversity have?
(a) Who is conducting the debate program?
(b) What is the topic of the debate competition?
(c) According to Karma, when will the life be easier?
(d) Why are people not willing to use their first language?
(e) In what way does the use of single language promote the economic growth?
(f) How can the use of single language help in solving international and
problems?
(g) According to Kabita, how does the knowledge die?
(h) What thing influences our thought?
(I ) How does the loss of languages affect the tourism?
(j) What kind of relationship do the cultural and linguistic diversity have?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)